Because the occasion is measured objectively, the defendant's mere belief that he or she was fulfilling a duty to communicate does not create such a duty. The issue is not whether the defendant had a right to make the communication or thought that he or she had a duty to make it, but rather whether a reasonable person would feel compelled by a duty to make the communication: Halls v. Mitchell, 1928 CanLII 1 (SCC), [1928] S.C.R. 125, [1928] 2 D.L.R. 97 at p.134 (S.C.C.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.