What is the test for determining whether a person has been injured by another person?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Gabor v. Boilard, 2015 BCSC 1724 (CanLII):
The causation test does not demand scientific precision and is not to be applied too rigidly. Causation is a practical question of fact which can best be answered by ordinary common sense: Snell v. Farrell, 1990 CanLII 70 (SCC), [1990] 2 S.C.R. 311.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In making a determinate order on a motion of no confidence in a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case, what are the reasons why such a determination is necessary? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a party has intended to injure another party in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for determining whether there has been anordinate delay in determining whether a claim has been successful? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the factors used to determine the diligence factor in determining whether to grant an application in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the "two step test" used to determine whether someone has a duty to repair or repair damage to another person by accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a person’s employment was a contributory factor in their personal injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a person acts within their legal rights, is that person liable even if another person suffers a loss? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a person is injured in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable person would expect icy conditions would have been present? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there a presumption of necessity in determining whether there is an absolute need for the court to order a search and seizure of a person who is not a witness? (British Columbia, Canada)
