What is the Ministry of Health's duty of reasonable care in relation to the installation of high voltage spans?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Botting v. British Columbia, 1996 CanLII 8642 (BC SC):

17 The Ministry's duty of reasonable care was to avoid acts and omissions which it could reasonably foresee would be likely to injure the users of the spans. It is well established that the duty will vary with the particular circumstances. For example, in Morris v. West Hartlepool Steam Navigation Co. Ltd. (1956), A.C.

Other Questions


What is the range of reasonableness for using the term “reasonable” in a claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law relating to the adequacy of reasons set out in the WCAT-2009-00048? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a decision maker review an entered order or related reasons? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for suspending a health professional’s registration under the Health Care Reform Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is reasonable conduct in litigation reasonable enough to warrant a reduction in costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the reasons given in reasons delivered in a civil case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for making reasonable efforts to improve their health but not being able to afford the treatments? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an occupier to prove reasonable steps taken by the occupier were reasonable in all circumstances? (British Columbia, Canada)
When a plumbing contractor is hired to complete plumbing services which includes the installation of materials and fixtures, does the contract stipulate that the materials used will be of good quality and reasonably fit for a purpose? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of the Health and Safety Executive’s comments in the context of the BC Health and Social Care Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.