What are the leading authorities on double costs due to a party's rejection of an offer to settle?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Avina v Sea Senor (Ship), 2017 BCSC 1406 (CanLII):

One of the leading authorities on double costs due to a party’s rejection of an offer to settle is the decision in Hartshorne v. Hartshorne, 2011 BCCA 29. That case set out a number of relevant considerations and described the guiding principles behind the double costs rule:

Other Questions


Does a court have any authority or authority to award double costs for failure to accept an offer that ought to have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the double costs awarded against a party for failing to accept an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party who is not otherwise entitled to costs still recover costs if their offer to settle is better than the result of the trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an offer to settle providing that each party bears its own costs an offer under Rule 37A? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a party entitled to double costs for refusing to accept an offer to settle that should have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the law of agency apply when one party gives explicit or implicit authority to another party (the principal) to enter contracts with third parties? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an offeror be awarded costs or double costs from the date of the offer? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a defendant to seek costs for an application for costs after an offer to settle was made? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law where a party has been awarded double costs for failing to accept an offer that should have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a defendant entitled to double costs for failing to respond to an offer to settle a claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.