Is there any case law where a party has been awarded double costs for failing to accept an offer that should have been accepted?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from S.S.T. v L.M.G, 2019 BCSC 686 (CanLII):
As discussed recently in H.K. at para. 17, citing Hartshorne v. Hartshorne 2011 BCCA 29, an award of double costs is a punitive measure for a party’s failure to accept an offer that should have been accepted.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a party entitled to double costs for failing to accept an offer that should have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the double costs awarded against a party for failing to accept an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an award of double costs for failing to accept an offer to settle that should have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a court have any authority or authority to award double costs for failure to accept an offer that ought to have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a party entitled to double costs for refusing to accept an offer to settle that should have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an offeror be awarded costs or double costs from the date of the offer? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to double costs for failing to accept a settlement offer? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the leading authorities on double costs due to a party's rejection of an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
How is the court likely to award double costs when the terms of an offer for spousal support and division of property are compared discretely? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a defendant entitled to double costs for failing to respond to an offer to settle a claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
