In respect of her work with the School District, the plaintiff argues there is both a past loss of income and a past loss of opportunity. The distinction between proof of past actual events and past hypothetical events was discussed in Gao v. Dietrich, 2018 BCCA 372. If the plaintiff establishes a real and substantial possibility of a hypothetical event, then the court must weigh that hypothetical event according to its relative likelihood. Past actual events must be proved on a balance of probabilities, and once proved they are treated as certainties.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.