What analysis of a Deputy Commissioner's decision, which upheld in part the applicant's grievances, is transparent and intelligible?

Canada (Federal), Canada

The following excerpt is from Timm v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FCA 179 (CanLII):

More particularly, we are of the view that the analysis of the Deputy Commissioner’s decision, which upheld in part the applicant’s grievances, is transparent and intelligible and falls within a range of possible, acceptable outcomes, which are defensible in respect of the facts and the law (Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190).

Other Questions


If an applicant succeeds in his res judicata application, does the application have grounds to stay the application? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does the date of the Registrar's decision on a motion of objection to a motion to amend and amend the terms of an application to amend the application? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the impact of analysis and analysis of the reasons used in a decision by an immigration officer? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can an applicant request an adjournment of an interview before a decision on his application is made? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What are the findings and conclusions of an officer's analysis and analysis of the applicant's case? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can a judicial review application be considered both in the merits of a decision on the professional misconduct of a bankruptcy trustee and in the subsequent decision determining the appropriate sanctions? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What are the limits on the amount of time that a court can extend an application to extend the application for an extension of the application? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the applicable standard of review for the purpose of determining an applicant's application for employment? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the impact of the interpreter at the hearing of an applicant's application for a disability benefits application? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applicable to a panel decision based on a lack of credibility in the refugee status applicant? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.