What privilege does a Department representative have over disclosure in a civil matter?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Kryschuk and Zulynik (Re), 1958 CanLII 150 (SK QB):

The department representative has; no privilege of his own from disclosure any more than anyone else. The proposed evidence to be given by the department officer must be objected to by one or other of the two parties concerned; providing they both or one of them objects, then the evidence would not be admissible because the law favours reconciliation and settlements, and the court will not take on itself a course which would be so prejudicial to its success. See McTaggart v. McTaggart, supra.

Other Questions


What is a privileged occasion and what is the effect on privileged occasions? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does Rule 212(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure apply to a claim of privilege where a document is withheld from production and inspection without objection? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that defamatory disclosure is a form of disclosure? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the fact that a mortgagee is not in possession of the mortgagee's property matter matter? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is contempt of an order registered under s. 13 of the Criminal Code of Canada a criminal or civil matter? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the principles that apply on the second ground of a claim under the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How do courts determine whether a matter arises out of a collective agreement? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the legal test for procedural issues in a civil action brought by a plaintiff in Canada? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on full disclosure and informed consent? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for admissibility of testimony by a plaintiff in a civil case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.