Is an error deemed to be overriding a finding of fact?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Windsor-Essex Children’s Aid Society v. E.W., 2019 ONSC 3404 (CanLII):

An error is overriding when it carries with it sufficient significance so as to vitiate the challenged finding of fact. Where the challenged finding of fact is based on a constellation of findings, the conclusion that one or more of those findings is founded on a palpable error does not automatically render the error an “overriding” one. To be “overriding”, the error must go to the root of the challenged finding of fact, such that the fact cannot safely stand in the face of that error: see Schwartz v. Canada, 1996 CanLII 217 (SCC), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 254 at p. 281, Waxman at para. 297 (emphasis added).

Other Questions


When will the court make a finding of fact or finding of not finding fact in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for applying palpable and overriding error standard in appellate review of findings of fact and of mixed fact and law? (Ontario, Canada)
Is an error deemed to be overriding overriding? (Ontario, Canada)
What is an overriding error in a finding of fact? (Ontario, Canada)
What is an "overriding error" in a finding of fact? (Ontario, Canada)
Can an appellate court interfere with a lower court’s findings of fact, absent palpable and overriding error? (Ontario, Canada)
What is an "overriding error" in the context of a challenged finding of fact? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for overturning a finding of fact or finding of law? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a finding of fact made on an interlocutory finding in a separate judicial proceeding engage in issue estoppel in a subsequent proceeding? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for finding that a trier-of-fact made a palpable and over-riding error? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.