Does a finding of fact made on an interlocutory finding in a separate judicial proceeding engage in issue estoppel in a subsequent proceeding?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Greater Niagara Transit Commission v. A.T.U., Local 1582, 1987 CanLII 5384 (ON SCDC):

In the first place, as a general rule, interlocutory findings of fact, including rulings made upon issues involving the admissibility of evidence, in one judicial proceeding do not engage the doctrine of issue estoppel in a subsequent proceeding on account of the absence of the critical elements of finality and identity of issues: see Duhamel v. The Queen, supra.

Other Questions


Can issue estoppel prevent parties from re-litigating issues previously decided in another court proceeding? (Ontario, Canada)
Is issue estoppel applicable in a civil proceeding after adjudication of issues in an administrative hearing? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of the Court of Appeal finding on the "live issue" in the context of the issue? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a party bring an issue of issue estoppel against the party seeking to relitigate the matter? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for using the term issue "issue" in the context of the issue? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the requirement that the Class Members raise common issues become entwined with the requirement of 5(1)(d) that a class proceeding would be a preferable procedure for resolution of the common issues? (Ontario, Canada)
When will the court make a finding of fact or finding of not finding fact in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court order that an earlier proceeding be stayed until the completion of the later proceeding is completed? (Ontario, Canada)
Can punitive damages be certified as a common issue for the first common issues trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for whether a class proceeding is preferable procedure for resolving common issues? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.