What is the burden of proving that a plaintiff has the ability to pay costs in a personal injury action?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Wong v. Huang et al., 2004 BCSC 848 (CanLII):

The onus lies on the defendants to establish that the plaintiff does not have the ability to pay costs: Lafleur v. Murphy, 2001 BCSC 736. The defendants have not discharged that burden. The absence of an affidavit setting out the proposed costs is also fatal to the defendants' application.

Other Questions


If historical driving records are relevant in personal injury actions, would they be relevant in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action, can a plaintiff recover large amounts of personal injury damages from a vocational consultant? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff in a personal injury action commence an action against a defendant in the same action against the same defendant? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a party to a personal injury action entitled to production of a party’s personal injury report? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff in a personal injury action obtain costs from a private legal aid scheme? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the costs of a plaintiff in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action, is cost of future care a consideration in damages for future care costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, what is the current state of the law on pain? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff should have to pay additional special costs in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.