From the authorities it appears that, where a person is permitted to occupy premises as a privilege or as remuneration or part payment for his services, he occupies as a tenant and not as a servant; but where it is necessary for the due performance of his duties for a person to occupy certain premises, or where he is required to occupy premises for the more satisfactory performance of his duties, such person occupies as a servant: Reed v. Cattermole [1937] 1 KB 613, 106 LJKB 407, [1937] 1 All ER 541; Halsbury, 2nd ed., p. 117; Smith v. Seghill Overseers (1875) LR 10 QB 422, 44 LJMG 1.14.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.