The appellate court's function when assessing the reasonableness of a verdict is set out in Corbett v. The Queen (1973), 1973 CanLII 199 (SCC), 14 C.C.C. (2d) 385 at 389: [T]he question is whether the verdict is unreasonable, not whether it is unjustified. The function of the court is not to substitute itself for the jury, but to decide whether the verdict is one that a property instructed jury acting judicially, could reasonably have rendered.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.