With reference to ground (1) I need not do more than state that I agree with the judgment of the learned Chief Justice in the case of Marcy v. Pierce (1899), 4 Terr. L.R. 186. That was a case where a writ of replevin was issued under similar circumstances, and all the reasons advanced in that judgment apply to the present application. I fail to find any distinction in principle between the two cases:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.