Can a landlord be held liable for failing to repair or repair a stairway?

New Brunswick, Canada


The following excerpt is from Fanjoy v. Gaston, 1981 CanLII 2868 (NB CA):

While the facts of the instant case may not fall within the category of cases where a landlord has been negligent in allowing the stairway to become out of repair, it seems reasonably clear to me to be a case where the landlord has failed to keep the access to the plaintiff’s apartment in a reasonably safe condition. He permitted the continuance of a situation involving danger where there was no handrail on the stairway when there should have been two, and by permitting the continued use of hard-rubber ribbed matting on the steps which, while reasonably safe when dry, became dangerous when wet. It should have been obvious and foreseeable to any careful and prudent landlord that the water was likely to be tracked onto the matting of the steps from outdoors during certain weather conditions which would render the steps slippery thereby making the stairway unsafe. In my view of the facts the landlord's failure to foresee that the stairway would become unsafe and to remedy the situation was no less negligent than would have been his failure to allow the steps to become "out of repair". In Dunster v. Hollis, at p. 803, Lush J. said: The second question, therefore, is whether the tenant has a right to sue the lessor for damages if he proves that the lessor was negligent in allowing the steps to be out of repair, even though the defect was visible and obvious. In other words, is the lessor merely under an obligation to avoid exposing the tenant to a trap or is he liable if through want of care he allows the premises to be in an unsafe condition? In my opinion the latter is the correct view. I do not see how a lessor who has impliedly undertaken to keep the access reasonably safe can avoid liability by proving that the tenant knew that the steps were old, worn, and defective. That fact may be a good ground for the conclusion that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, but I must hold that that in itself affords no answer to the action.

Other Questions


What is the test for damages for failing to provide adequate notice of dismissal? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Can a lender be held liable for negligence if a document is found to be defective or missing? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for liability in a stairway case? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for failing to keep an adequate records of an employee? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the standard of care provided by a surgeon to a plaintiff in a surgical malpractice case? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the marital property application? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the standard of review for errors attributed to a trial judge? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for obtaining a guardianship order? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Can an affidavit be struck as inadmissible? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the reasonable notice period for an employee to claim damages for non-payment of severance? (New Brunswick, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.