In Cooper v. Miller, 1994 CanLII 120 (SCC), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 359, the court considered whether disability benefits under a collective agreement fell within the “insurance exception” to the rule against double recovery in tort actions. In concluding that wage replacement benefits pursuant to a collective agreement were not deductible from a loss of income claim, the majority said, at paragraph 95: Further, the presence or absence of a third party carrier for the insurance will not affect the non-deductibility of the benefits from the wage claim. ... (emphasis added) And at paragraph 96: It is often more economical for large corporations to self-insure than to purchase insurance from a third party carrier. Risk can be spread among the employees, who are the policy-holders of the self-insurance. The law should not discourage the efficiencies of self-insurance within large corporations or government agencies.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.