The court must give the government a “margin of appreciation” when considering whether legislation “minimally impairs” a Charter right. The test is not whether the court could conceive of a measure that would be less intrusive of a Charter right. Where the measure adopted falls outside a range of “reasonable alternatives”, and does not impair the Charter right “as little as reasonably possible”, the court will find it does not satisfy the minimal impairment test: Trociuk v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2003 SCC 34, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 835 at para. 36.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.