In Strong v. Poster, 17 C.B. 201, 25 L.J.C.P. 106 (139 E.R. 1047) Willes, J., at p. 1056, said: The result seems to be, that, here, if evidence is admissible to show that the defendant signed the note as surety, it must also be shown that the bankers agreed to accept him as such; and consequently, that, in the present case, where there was no such evidence, the defendant is not entitled to be treated as a surety, and the defence does not arise.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.