What is the test for a defendant to continue to be able to do so?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Slaton v. Alphabytes Computer Corp., 2005 CanLII 21119 (ON SC):

The issues were squarely before the court. The issue was litigated and the defendant ought not to be able to do it again. If this were permitted, litigation would have no end, except where legal ingenuity is exhausted. It is a principle of law that this cannot be permitted, and there is abundant authority reiterating the principle. See Hoystead v. Taxation Commissioner, 1925 CanLII 607 (UK JCPC), [1926] A.C. 155 at 165-66.

Other Questions


Does a deemed admission made by one defendant be admissible against the other defendants? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there a requirement for the defence to disclose decisions on whether to continue to defend against the Crown in a sexual assault case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test to prove that continuation of a support order would be continuation of the order if the support order is not inconsistent or absurd? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for adding a defendant to a defendant list? (Ontario, Canada)
On the ground of urgency, in what circumstances will the applicant continue with her application for leave to continue with the application? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a party who entered into a will and continues to hold and continue as a devisee for life under a will that the testator seized? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a defendant have to demonstrate prejudice at a status hearing? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a cause of action against a defendant prior to the statutory limitation period? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a partial judgment be granted on admissions made by a Defendant? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a defendant who lives in a house that is unique to the province, lose the house? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.