Is there a requirement for the defence to disclose decisions on whether to continue to defend against the Crown in a sexual assault case?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. L.N.H.C., 2016 ONCJ 144 (CanLII):

[20] With the onus of proof resting with the Crown at trial, there is no requirement that the defence disclose decisions on those matters at this time, see: R v. Chaulk, 1990 CanLII 34 (SCC), [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303.

Other Questions


In a sexual assault trial where there are two versions of the same events, what is the role of the trial judge in determining whether the accused has proven his case beyond a reasonable doubt? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the test for acquittal in a sexual assault case where there is defence evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law in which a similar fact evidence has been found to support an allegation of sexual assault made by one boy against another? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is there any case law in the context of sexual assault cases where there is no evidence of physical harm or sexual assault? (British Columbia, Canada)
Are there any allegations of sexual assault, sexual assault or sexual assault against a minor? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there a new trial for the defence in the case of a man who was found not guilty of assault but found guilty of the charge on self-defence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the defence of the good faith defence in the context of allegations of sexual assault against a police officer? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any prejudice in a sexual assault case where there has been a significant passage of time between August 2003 and July 2004? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the defence of defence in a sexual assault case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for establishing that there is "no evidence that the justice must be satisfied" to convict a defendant in a sexual assault case? (British Columbia, Canada)