What is the reasonableness of requiring an examination for fitness where there have been three roadside suspensions within two years?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Gyles v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2004 BCCA 541 (CanLII):
The reasonableness of the Superintendent’s policy of requiring an examination for fitness where there are three roadside suspensions within two years was recently considered by this court in Sigurdson v. B.C., 2003 BCCA 535. Low J.A. speaking for the court said:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a three year hiatus from school constitute a three-year hiatus for a child of the marriage to be reinstated as a Child of the Marriage? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can counsel for the party being examined on examination for discovery interfere on cross-examination? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevant time frame for calculating a delay under s. 11(b) of the Criminal Code of Canada for the purpose of computing a reasonable trial within a reasonable time? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are sufficient reasons are required for a trial judge to leave a defendant with no reasonable doubt? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it reasonable to assume that the same land, year in and year out, will produce the same results? (British Columbia, Canada)
Under Rule 30(1) of the Rules of Court, can an independent medical examination be ordered for the purposes of determining whether an individual is fit for trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an occupier to prove reasonable steps taken by the occupier were reasonable in all circumstances? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevance of Rule 11‑6(4) of the Rules of Civil Procedure and Procedure requiring a physical examination? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is reasonable conduct in litigation reasonable enough to warrant a reduction in costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a defendant continue to examine for discovery after an examination for discovery has been adjourned? (British Columbia, Canada)
