What is the role of the adjudicator in making findings of fact?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Polson v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2014 BCSC 700 (CanLII):

Frankel J.A. further noted that it was up to the adjudicator to review and assess the evidence presented on the review and to determine what evidence to accept and what to reject. At para. 27 he endorsed the following statement of Gray J. in Shadow v. Superintendent of Motor Vehicles et al., 2002 BCSC 790: Making findings of fact, including choosing what or who to believe and not believe, and drawing inferences from the evidence, is the responsibility of the adjudicator. If there is some evidence upon which a finding could reasonably be made, this court should not interfere. … [Emphasis added by Frankel J.A.]

Other Questions


Is the adjudicator entitled to make findings of fact on conflicting evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an adjudicator to make a finding of fact in a motor vehicle application? (British Columbia, Canada)
How can an adjudicator make findings of fact and credibility issues on conflicting evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for judicial review of the findings of the Disability Review Officer's findings of fact, law or mixed fact and law? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a finding that a judge must not make a finding which would directly contradict a finding previously made by another judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a judicial review of a finding of fact, law or mixed fact? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of the respondent’s position that the adjudicator must consider all the relevant evidence before making a credibility finding? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for making a finding of fact? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for making findings of fact on disputed evidence in a jurisdictional issue? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a adjudicator's reasoning be manifestly flawed where the adjudicator failed to consider the evidence supporting the findings of two witnesses? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.