What is the test for medical opinion respecting each item claimed by the insurance company?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Palani v Lin, 2021 BCSC 59 (CanLII):

The court must be satisfied only that the future care is medically justified as opposed to medically necessary. It is not necessary to have a medical opinion respecting each item claimed, but there should be some evidence that the expense claimed is directly related to the disability arising out of the accident: Gregory v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2011 BCCA 144 at para. 39.

Other Questions


Does a medical report obtained by an employee of an insurance company under s.99 of the Insurance Regulation apply to a plaintiff's claim of benefits? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is resolution of an important part of a claim against a party in a personal injury claim against the other party to the claim substantially less impact on the balance of the claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a medical opinion supporting a claim for medical expenses unnecessary? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for medical opinion respecting each item claimed by a plaintiff? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a physician required to provide an opinion on the medical necessity of the future care items claimed? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to be successful in a claim against an insurance company? (British Columbia, Canada)
When a managing director of a company acts in breach of his fiduciary duties to the company, does he have to disclose to the purchaser of a part of the company’s business? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it necessary for a plaintiff to advance a future cost of care claim, in a medical malpractice action, to have a physician testify to the medical necessity of each and every item of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have medical and/or legal opinions been interpreted in medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What have the medical opinions of the medical specialists who have advised the Respondent to follow their recommendations? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.