The only judicial support which I could find for the view I take on this issue is Foster v. Moore (1886), 11 P.R. 447. In that case Ferguson J. held that an action similar in nature to the proceedings under The Fraudulent Preferences Act brought title to land in question and that on the basis of legislation similar to that contained in s. 48(1) and (2) of The Queen’s Bench Act a lis pendens could be filed, and he refused an order for vacating such filing.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.