Is King’s Bench Rule 684 the same as English Marginal Rule 989?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Barsi v. Farcas, 1924 CanLII 113 (SK CA):
King’s Bench Rule 684 is the same as English Marginal Rule 989, and under it a set-off cannot be allowed except between the same parties in the same action (David v. Rees [1904] 2 K.B. 435, 73 L.J.K.B. 729).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the current state of the law on third party procedure in King’s Bench? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for adding a defendant to a claim under s. 44 of The Queen’s Bench Act? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the meaning of words in the English language? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the meaning of the words "substantially the same" in the English Rules of Civil Procedure? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a matrimonial domicile acquired by residence as distinct from domicility in the ordinary sense give any jurisdiction to divorce in English law? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the implications of the new Queen’s Bench Rules for summary judgment applications? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for discovering discovery in English practice? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the effect of the word “or their heirs” in English language? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the withholding of documents constitute “rule of law” in English legislation? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of a word in English by statute? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
