In Kauwell v. Melnyk, 2007 BCSC 485, 156 A.C.W.S. (3d) 151 [Melnyk cited to BCSC], Shabbits J. reviewed the law in British Columbia with regard to the application of an automatic finding of corresponding deprivation. He adopted the reasoning of Ballance J. in Massincaud and held at para. 97 that: If a deprivation is not presumed from a finding of enrichment, in order to determine whether a deprivation exists the court must look at direct and indirect contributions of the claimant and the effect that those contributions have had on her career, training, opportunities to earn income, and whether she has forgone remuneration for the services provided.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.