Can the arrest of plaintiffs be justified?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Kendall and Kendall v. Gambles Canada Ltd., Graham, Bowering and Landru, 1981 CanLII 2149 (SK QB):

The plaintiffs were arrested for theft, an indictable offence, but the prosecution failed. However that in itself does not end the matter. The defendants may in this action show, as their justification for the imprisonment of the plaintiffs that in fact the plaintiffs were found committing the offence, Frey v. Fedoruk (supra). But this too they have failed to do. Can their arrest still be justified?

Other Questions


Can a private person who makes an arrest justify doing so by showing that he had reasonable grounds to believe the arrest had been committed? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a plaintiff be indemnified for any damage caused to a plaintiff’s storage facility by a lighter man? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a plaintiff justified in refusing to accept payment from defendant Sophie Brounstein? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the difference between a plaintiff and plaintiff in a motor vehicle accident claim for medical attention? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the consequences of wrongfully arresting and maliciously prosecuting a plaintiff? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have an interest in land? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have a duty to others using the highway to avoid injury? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to prove reasonable excuse in a motor vehicle accident case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a plaintiff obtain a personal judgment from the Superior Court of Justice? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is there any case law where a defendant was not aware of the unusual danger caused by moisture on the floor into which a plaintiff stepped into? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.