What is the legal test for patent unreasonableness?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Stark v. Board of School Trustees of School District No. 39 (Vancouver) et al, 2005 BCSC 931 (CanLII):

It is well established that a reviewing court must employ a pragmatic and functional approach in determining which of the three standards of review to apply to an administrative body’s decision; patent unreasonableness, unreasonableness simpliciter or correctness. The central focus of the approach is to determine whether the question before the tribunal was one which the legislature intended be exclusively determined by the tribunal as opposed to the courts: Dr. Q v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 226, 2003 SCC 19 [Dr. Q.].

Other Questions


Does the Court of Appeal in Dunsmuir hold that a patent unreasonableness standard set forth in s. 59(3) and (4) of the Anti-Patent Unreasonableness Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between an unreasonable decision and a patently unreasonable decision? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of the Court of Appeal Tribunal’s "unreasonable" and "patently unreasonable" interpretation of policy by the tribunal? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can patent unreasonableness be considered in the context of a section of legislation? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is patent unreasonableness the standard of review for findings of fact or law or exercise of discretion under the Administrative Tribunals Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the description of the legal basis of the petition fail to articulate the legal grounds to be advanced? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the appropriate standard of review for an application for judicial review of patent unreasonableness? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal background to s. 71 of the Legal Profession Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is a patently unreasonable decision? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the standard of review apply to a review of a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal decision to which the decision was patently unreasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.