It is well established that a reviewing court must employ a pragmatic and functional approach in determining which of the three standards of review to apply to an administrative body’s decision; patent unreasonableness, unreasonableness simpliciter or correctness. The central focus of the approach is to determine whether the question before the tribunal was one which the legislature intended be exclusively determined by the tribunal as opposed to the courts: Dr. Q v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 226, 2003 SCC 19 [Dr. Q.].
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.