On the other hand, in Toth v. de Frias (1996), 78 B.C.A.C. 34, Donald J.A. upheld the decision of a trial judge to deny a claim in unjust enrichment. Donald J.A. rejected the appellant’s contention that the trial judge ignored the appellant’s contribution of household services and noted that the trial judge’s decision “rests on the finding that the benefits derived by the plaintiff in the relationship offset her contributions such that in the end no deprivation was established” (para. 22).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.