What is the test for reasonableness at a tribunal?

Nova Scotia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Nova Scotia (Director of Assessment) v. Wolfson, 2008 NSCA 120 (CanLII):

In applying reasonableness, the court examines the tribunal’s decision, first to identify an intelligible line of reasoning to a conclusion, then second to determine whether that conclusion is within the range of acceptable outcomes. Dunsmuir, ¶ 47, 49; Lake v. Canada (Minister of Justice), 2008 SCC 23 at ¶ 41; PANS Pension Plan ¶ 63.

Other Questions


What are the reasons of a trial judge’s reasons for a finding of fact? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the reasonableness standard for making a decision at an administrative tribunal? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is a decision by a tribunal unreasonable if there is no line of analysis that could reasonably lead from the evidence before it to the conclusion? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the reasonableness standard for an administrative tribunal's interpretation of a statute by its own statute? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for judicial deference in determining whether a statutory interpretation is reasonable or unreasonable under reasonableness review? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a decision of a statutory tribunal? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for a review court to determine whether a tribunal’s decision is justified, transparent and intelligible? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
In what circumstances have courts imputed income to a payor who provides no medical evidence to support the payor's claim of not being able to work for health reasons? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for reasonableness in the context of a judicial review? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Can "inadvertence" amount to a reasonable excuse that justifies a motion for abridgment of time? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.