The following excerpt is from Maritime Paper Products Ltd. v. Communications, Energy, and Paperworkers’ Union, Local 1520, 2008 NSSC 329 (CanLII):
I adopt the analysis in Casino Nova Scotia v. Nova Scotia (Labour Standards Board, 2008 NSSC 251, where, at ¶ 14 Murphy J. states that the review court must consider: “(1) the tribunal’s process in articulating its reasons and the route to the outcomes of those reasons; (2) whether the tribunal’s decision is justified, transparent and intelligible; (3) whether the tribunal’s decision falls within an acceptable range of outcomes that are defensible in respect of the facts and the law; (4) whether the tribunal’s reasons support the decision.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.