What is the test for the doctrine of time limitation in real estate transactions?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from McLean v. Garland, 1884 CanLII 15 (ON CA):
The Court held that, ever since Dunch v. Kent, 1 Vern. 260, the doctrine was that the time limited for the creditors to come in is not of the essence of the deed.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How has the court interpreted the doctrine of misrepresentation in the context of square footage in real estate transactions? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Estate of Yehuda's Estate have to prove that there is a likelihood that the Estate will be able to claim severance? (Ontario, Canada)
If a limitation period is extended after the expiry of the limitation period, is it appropriate to amend the statute of limitation period? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the third principle in the context of a real estate transaction? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for proving dishonesty of fraud in a real estate transaction? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for caveat emptor in real estate transactions? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for specific performance in a real estate transaction? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for part performance in real estate transactions? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the red flags of fraud in real estate transactions? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any basis to interfere with a testator's choice of the respondents as estate trustees of his estate? (Ontario, Canada)
