Justice Dawson of our Court put it very well, apropos here: The defendants' arguments above that the contract is incomplete because essential provisions have not been settled or agreed upon or because the contract is uncertain must fail. The contract executed by the parties was not sophisticated, but no essential terms were missing. The contract is not too general or uncertain to be valid. In this instance, it cannot be said that the parties here expressed their intention so unclearly that a court cannot discern what their intentions were. [Martel v. Mohr, 2011 SKQB 161, 370 Sask.R. 104 at para. 51]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.