What is a significant gap between alleged contraventions in human rights legislation?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Tarbuck v. Vancouver Board of Education, 2013 BCHRT 59 (CanLII):
A significant gap between alleged contraventions may be taken as breaking or limiting the continuity of the contraventions: Dickson v. Vancouver Island Human Rights Coalition, 2005 BCHRT 209, paras. 16-17.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the difference between allegations of sexual assault and continuing contravention of human rights legislation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the meaning of the language of the Canadian Human Rights Code in the context of human rights legislation? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Respondent at the Human Rights Tribunal of B.C. claim that the Applicant be denied the right to continue to pursue his human rights claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for continuing contravention of human rights legislation? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the general statement that there is ongoing discrimination at A constitute continuing contravention of human rights legislation? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law supporting a finding of continuing contravention of human rights legislation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether the Human Rights Tribunal of BC has jurisdiction to hear a human rights complaint against the respondent? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for timely continuing contravention of human rights legislation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for “significantly unfair” in s. 95(2) of the Canadian Human Rights Code? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is Canada's human rights legislation constitutional or statutory? (British Columbia, Canada)
