What standard of review is applied to the findings of fact and sanction under the RCMP Act?

Canada (Federal), Canada

The following excerpt is from Gill v. Canada (Attorney General), 2006 FC 1106 (CanLII):

The respondent submitted that the standard of review to be applied to the Commissioner’s findings of fact and sanction is patent unreasonableness (see Gordon v. Canada (Solicitor General), 2003 FC 1250 at paragraphs 19 and 23). It was submitted that the question of whether notice was sufficient to meet the requirements of subsection 43(6) of the RCMP Act is a question of mixed fact and law reviewable on a standard of reasonableness simpliciter.

Other Questions


If a court finds that a plaintiff has been denied a right to sue under a different legal standard than under the current standard of care, can the finding be reviewed? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied in reviewing a Minister's Delegate? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review applied in reviewing a decision of the Minister refusing to grant Ministerial Relief? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does the BIA have applied the correct standard of review in its de-novo review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the de novo standard of review applied to a finding that a threat to public safety temporarily suspends the obligation of a Miranda warning? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the presumption of reasonableness review automatically engage with correctness standards of review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review for a finding of fact? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can a decision maker such as the Immigration Officer on an application for permanent residents in Canada be reviewed on a higher standard of review of patent unreasonableness? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable to review of a decision of an adjudicator appointed pursuant to the Canada Labour Code? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review applied when procedural fairness is breached? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.