Can a dental college be a person aggrieved?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Allen v. College of Dental Surgeons of British Columbia, 2005 BCSC 842 (CanLII):
Drost J. referred to the passage quoted above from Attorney General of the Gambia v. N’Jie and concluded that the College may be a person aggrieved. However, he did not deal with the issue before me, namely, whether a member of the public who initiates a complaint may be a person aggrieved within the meaning of s. 55(1) of the Dentists Act.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
If a person acts within their legal rights, is that person liable even if another person suffers a loss? (British Columbia, Canada)
What defines an informed person and what defines that informed person? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a personal representative of the deceased's estate make a claim under s. 151(3) of the BC Supreme Court of Justice for personal representative leave to continue to pursue his claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of personal experiences on the assessment of non-pecuniary damages in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the meaning of the phrase “person aggrieved” in section 55 of the Dentists Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can one person's invitation to touch another person's penis constitute an assault? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff’s personal injury fund available for use in a personal injury litigation deduction? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a person has been injured by another person? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, what is the current state of the law on pain? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
