What is the test for privilege in the context of privilege at bar?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Cliff v. King (Estate of), 2005 BCSC 718 (CanLII):
Goldie J.A. concurred and stated (at ¶15): To go further in the case at bar than the example of the description adopted by the Chief Justice in Hodgkinson v. Simms would be to allow a party to look into the mind of counsel for the opposing party. That would destroy the very purpose of privilege.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there an implied waiver of privilege where a party waives privilege but takes a position in relation to privileged materials that is inconsistent with maintaining privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an independent statement privileged in the context of solicitor-and-client privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law in which privilege has been abused in the context of privilege at bar? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has privilege been interpreted in the context of disclosure privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is litigation privilege and what is the effect of litigation privilege on court-appointed and joint appointed experts? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury case, is it possible for counsel to provide a more detailed description of privileged material without disclosing privileged material? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is privileged treatment of information obtained by the respondent in the context of the ABBA? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any evidence that the privilege holder has a voluntary intention to waive the privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is litigation privilege and what is the argument that litigation privilege means? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a union's communications with its membership and other publications in the labour relations context an occasion for qualified privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
