Counsel for the plaintiff relies on Just v. British Columbia (1991), 60 B.C.L.R. (2d) 209 (S.C.), where Donald J.(as he then was), did not allow benefits to be deducted since, as he said at p. 231: The defendant produced nothing to enable me to match this benefit against any specific category of loss claimed in this action. I am, therefore, unable to say whether the benefit should be applied against non-pecuniary damages or loss of wages, or, if against both, how much should be allocated to each.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.