When will an application to adduce fresh evidence be dismissed?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Minski v. Minski, 2004 SKCA 25 (CanLII):
We are all of the view the application to adduce fresh evidence does not meet the tests of Maitland v. Drozda[1] and Turbo Resources v. Gibson.[2] Accordingly, the application is dismissed.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can an application be made for an extension of time on an application to extend the time on which the application is granted? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a plea of guilty constitute an estoppel against the prosecution from requiring the prosecution to adduce evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the difference between a discharge application and the discharge application? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is an interest in land subject to encumbrances sufficient to warrant the dismissal of an application for security for costs? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts considered the credibility of the evidence in the context of a loan application? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the difference between an application for costs of examination at the bar and the application for the same amount? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for allowing evidence to be adduce at the Court of Appeal in the context of an appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the legal test for admitting fresh evidence in a personal injury case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can evidence of a chemical analysis of a sample taken after the 2-hour period be used in evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will an application for relief be successful because of the applicant's failure to read or understand the seriousness of the legal documents set out the claim against him? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
