Does the designation of a dangerous offender need to be changed to prevent reoffending?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Little v. Bath (Warden), 2013 ONSC 7604 (CanLII):

The Applicant submits the current use of the designation of dangerous offender here is made to further punish the offender rather than to ensure proper supervision of the offender upon completing a sentence. He submits he is no longer a risk to reoffend. See, Gallichon v. Canada (Commissioner of Corrections), 101 C.C.C. (3d) at page 414.

Other Questions


What is a material change in the definition of a change in terms of material change? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the principles relevant to “defective design actions” in the context of design defects? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a material change in circumstances under what circumstances would have changed the terms of an order under which an order was made? (Ontario, Canada)
When an employer unilaterally changes the essential terms of an employee’s contract of employment and the employee does not agree to the changes, is the employee constructively dismissed? (Ontario, Canada)
Is the continued conflict between the parties a material change in circumstances for a change in a restraining order? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any material change on the basis that the applicant has suffered a material change connected with his desire to retire? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for declaring an offender a long-term offender? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for changing a temporary order without requiring a material change? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on sentencing dangerous offenders? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the delivery of a s. 112 assessment report constitute a material change in circumstances justifying a change in the existing arrangement? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.