24 I could not disagree with the general proposition (Buntine v. Hume [1993] V.L.R. 123 (Aust.)) that "In some contexts you may speak about a person being engaged in an occupation for however short a period he may be occupied therein. In another context, however, the word 'engaged' conveys a different meaning, i.e. it excludes mere casual or intermittent employment and rather connotes ... the whole or, at least, a substantial part of the person's time" but the Act here provides an established context, not a new and broader framework.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.