What is the onus on employers to be aware of and observe the minimum legislative requirements respecting employment?

British Columbia, Canada

The following excerpt is from Waddell v. Cintas Corp., 1999 CanLII 5161 (BC SC):

The plaintiff argues that Shore v. Ladner Downs and Machtinger support the proposition that the onus is on employers to be aware of and to observe the minimum legislative requirements respecting employment so that employees receive the protections to which they are entitled without being placed in a position of having to ask for those protections. It is submitted that this onus extends to knowledge of and compliance with the employment legislation enacted in each province in which the employer has employees. Accordingly, the plaintiff argues that the termination clause contained in the Employment Agreement is void insofar as it purports to govern the plaintiff’s employment in British Columbia because it is based on the laws of Ontario.

Other Questions

Is an employer required to point out the strengths and weaknesses of an employment contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can the BC government adopt the same or similar legislation or legislation in respect of a future election or referendum? (British Columbia, Canada)
If an employer loses trust in an employee as a result of an employer's orders, in the matter of substance being willfully disobeyed and met with insubordination, can an employer dismiss the employee? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an employer required to inquire if an employee is ill or disabled before terminating their employment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What rights does the employment standards legislation have to the employer? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on the requirement of an employer to warn an employee that they have failed to meet performance standards? (British Columbia, Canada)
What evidence is required to prove the purpose of the legislation is to infringe aboriginal rights? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a stay of an order requiring an employer to pay an employee the amount it has been ordered to pay? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an employer unilaterally change the terms of an employee's employment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff be considered a travelling employee for workers’ compensation purposes when he drives from his home to his employer’s office in Richmond, after driving to the employer's office? (British Columbia, Canada)

Whitelogo nobg 300dpi sm

"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.