Does the Occupier have a duty to make the premises reasonably safe?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Ball v. GAP (Canada) Inc., 2001 BCSC 1106 (CanLII):
While it is the case that the occupier is not an insurer and that the standard is not one of perfection, the Act does place an affirmative duty on the occupier to make the premises reasonably safe. See Waldick v. Malcolm, 1991 CanLII 71 (SCC), [1991] 2 S.C.R. 456.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the duty of an occupier to make a premises reasonably safe? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an occupier to prove reasonable steps taken by the occupier were reasonable in all circumstances? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is New Orient an "occupier" of a premises under the Occupier's Rights Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a defendant required to drive her vehicle in a reasonable, prudent and safe manner and in accordance with the circumstances that confronted her? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevant time frame for calculating a delay under s. 11(b) of the Criminal Code of Canada for the purpose of computing a reasonable trial within a reasonable time? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between reasonable notice and reasonable working notice? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the reasons given in reasons delivered in a civil case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is reasonable conduct in litigation reasonable enough to warrant a reduction in costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of reasonableness for using the term “reasonable” in a claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing that a curb is not reasonably safe? (British Columbia, Canada)
