Is a policy or other instrument expressed to be made in pursuance of the Act?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Fisher v. Fisher, 1898 CanLII 23 (ON CA):
It is not necessary that the policy or other instrument should be expressed to be made in pursuance of the Act. If it is such a policy or declaration as is mentioned in the Act that is sufficient: Holt v. Everall (1876), 2 Ch. D. 266.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a policy respond to a claim where the policy sought to be engaged was issued to the claimant's employer? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a defendant’s predominant motivation (i.e. religion or expression) to exercise s. 2(b) freedom of expression? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a purchaser of a life insurance policy entitled to the proceeds of the policy to his wife and children? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a policy that covers upgrades required by a municipality by-laws an exclusion from the policy? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a policy decision not to inspect at all an unassailable policy decision? (Ontario, Canada)
Canjet obtain a cancellation policy where the insurer would pay the cancellation costs of Canjet customers for the duration of the policy? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a clause in a policy that states that an insurer may deny coverage, such as s. 1.4 of the policy, be interpreted as "may" preclude coverage? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a child's expressed wish to move from the custodial parent's home to the other parent’s home constitute a material change in circumstances? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to recover damages that exceed the amount of the policy limits of the at-fault party? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the impact of freedom of expression in the context of restrictions on the media reporting on matrimonial disputes? (Ontario, Canada)
