How have courts dealt with a petition for judicial review of a decision to uphold a roadside prohibition?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Delalla, 2015 BCSC 592 (CanLII):

In Tanner v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2012 BCSC 2037, Justice Schultes dismissed a petition for judicial review of an adjudicator’s decision to uphold the petitioner’s roadside prohibition. The petitioner argued a failure by the commissioner for taking affidavits to sign in the space designated constituted a violation of the governing legislation’s requirement that a report be sworn or solemnly affirmed. Schultes J. distinguished between a signature and the oath or affirmation itself:

Other Questions


What is the standard of review for a judicial review of a decision of an adjudicator confirming a roadside driving prohibition? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the judicial review approach used by a court engaged in judicial review? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review on a judicial review of a decision of the Superintendent to uphold an IRP? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a judicial review decision by a chambers judge who failed to take the necessary steps to review a decision by the chambers judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the standards of review applicable to a judicial review of a decision made under the Rules of Review Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the general practice of the courts in Canada not hearing a judicial review petition before a tribunal has rendered its final decision? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts dealt with judicial review of a decision made under the same bylaw enforcement regime? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for petitioning the Supreme Court of BC to overturn a decision made by the BC Court of Justice in favour of a slata plan? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied by an appellate court reviewing a decision of a trial judge concerning matters of custody and access? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the prematurity principle mean that a judicial review petition will not be heard before a tribunal has rendered its final decision? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.