Is there any case law that supports the argument that full and fair compensation must be paid out for loss and damages as a result of expropriation?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Tanex Industries Ltd. v Greater Vancouver Water District, 2019 BCSC 74 (CanLII):
Tanex relies quite heavily on the remarks of Mr. Justice Cory in Toronto Area Transit Operating Authority v. Dell Holdings Ltd., 1997 CanLII 400 (SCC), [1997] 1 S.C.R. 32 in support of its position that in every case, full and fair compensation must be paid for loss and damages which are the natural and reasonable consequence of the expropriation.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for damages under the Child Support and Support Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between determining a cause of injury and assessing damages to compensate for that damage? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a Workers’s Compensation Appeal Tribunal case, is there any case law that supports the argument that there is no case law in favour of a claim under the Employment Benefits Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is entitlement on the basis of compensation, non-compensation, and contractual support? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that a plaintiff was injured as a result of an actionable wrong? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law in the history of the Court of Appeal to support the argument that reason is insufficient to support a claim of reason? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the fact that an expense relates to an extracurricular activity bring the amount of child support under s. 7 of the Child Support Guidelines (e.g. expenses) into s.7 of the child support table? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts in India considered the issue of non-compensation and compensatory support for the purposes of spousal support? (British Columbia, Canada)
When a spousal support order is varied as a result of a change in circumstances and a review of the support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff claim aggravated damages for mental distress as a result of the denial of pay in lieu of notice? (British Columbia, Canada)
