Does a 40 year old employee have to seek medical attention for an ankle injury?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Charles v. Dudley, 2012 BCSC 1301 (CanLII):

In Loik v. Hannah, 2009 BCSC 1196, a 43 year old worker suffered similar injuries and failed to seek appropriate medical attention. She was an administrative worker who had difficulty performing her duties for a few months and who had some lingering symptoms 3 years after the accident.

Other Questions


What is the current state of the law on medical justification for medical expenses in personal injury cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between a plaintiff’s medical history and the medical history of her injuries? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for medical expenses in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff’s personal injury fund available for use in a personal injury litigation deduction? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the entire agreement clause in a medical malpractice case apply to all medical malpractices? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, what is the current state of the law on pain? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action, can a plaintiff bring an application to have all lay and medical witnesses present their evidence by teleconference? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the reasonableness of a commercial insurance contract where an employer prohibits the use of an employee’s personal injury insurance? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for conducting a medical examination in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.