In what circumstances will a defendant be held not liable in a tort action for negligence?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Britt v. Klimczak, 2010 SKQB 407 (CanLII):
In Stann v. Lukan (supra), the defendant was held not liable, in part because the plaintiff failed to shown reliance on a negligent representation made by the defendant. Dawson J. stated, at paras. 91-93:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a multi-defendant class action be certified if there is no cause of action against each defendant? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a sheriff be held liable in a civil action for failing to properly supervise the actions of a sheriff? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a defendant be found liable in a trespass action? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a defendant be liable in a trespass action for his own imprisonment? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a defendant be successful in a motion to strike his name out of a personal injury action? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a defendant be held liable for malicious intent for making false statements? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a plaintiff in a personal injury action commence a second action for damages arising out of the same circumstances? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is an auditor liable for negligence of omission or negligence of commission? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a defendant be held liable for negligence after the shipment has arrived? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a mortgagee be liable for any loss and damage caused by negligence on a bill for redemption? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
