The defendant is strongly opposed to any order for spousal support. He argues that the evidence demonstrates that the plaintiff has suffered no economic disadvantage arising from her marriage or its breakup. She has been in her current employment since April 1989, her employment is secure and she has not indicated any intention to either upgrade or change vocations. Accordingly, he argues there is no need for ongoing spousal support based on either a compensatory basis (Moge v. Moge 1992 CanLII 25 (SCC), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 813) or a needs-based basis (Bracklow v. Bracklow, 1999 CanLII 715 (SCC), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 420).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.