What constitutes a reasonable step to notify users of a premises of exclusion clause?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Apps v Grouse Mountain Resorts Ltd., 2019 BCSC 855 (CanLII):
There has been much litigation over what constitutes “reasonable steps” to notify users of premises of exclusion clauses. In the cases that deal with ski accidents while there are factual distinctions between signed waiver cases and day ticket cases where the user of the mountain does not sign anything, the principles of law are the same: Schuster v. Blackcomb Skiing Enterprises Ltd. Partnership, [1994] B.C.J. No. 2602 (S.C.) at para. 14.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a warranty exclusion exclusion of economic loss excluded from the warranty exclusion? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between reasonable notice and reasonable working notice? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a vehicle provided by an employer as a crew bus constitute an extension of the employer's premises? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of reasonableness for using the term “reasonable” in a claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is reasonable conduct in litigation reasonable enough to warrant a reduction in costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevant time frame for calculating a delay under s. 11(b) of the Criminal Code of Canada for the purpose of computing a reasonable trial within a reasonable time? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the duty of an occupier to make a premises reasonably safe? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an occupier to prove reasonable steps taken by the occupier were reasonable in all circumstances? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the reasons for judgment on a constitutional issue on “taking up” or interjurisdictional immunity? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the reasons given in reasons delivered in a civil case? (British Columbia, Canada)
